Contracting with your SaaS customers can be difficult. Beyond your SaaS contract template you’ll often get into the process of negotiating contracts with your customers. Negotiating can increase your sales cycles and cause confusion and frustration. Understanding what you can negotiate and some common negotiation methods will help you speed this phase of your sales cycle. This post will walk through five SaaS contract negotiation points that are commonly negotiated and common methods to help with a fast negotiation.
Liability – One of The Most Important SaaS Negotiation Points
Negotiating the level of liability in sales contracts is a critical step for Software as a Service (SaaS) startups, and it can have a lot of implications for their success and long-term company risk profile as you scale. In the SaaS industry, understanding why and how to handle liability is can save you from a lot of pain later on.
First of all, SaaS startups must recognize that the liability clause in their sales contracts is not just a legal formality. It serves as a safeguard, outlining the boundaries of responsibility and accountability for both parties. This is in particularly important when you customers are enterprise customers. They are taking a risk by using your startups software and will negotiate to have a liability clause which reflects that risk.
Startups open themselves up to being liable for the risk and need to ensure they don’t take on an outsized level of liability. Without a well-negotiated liability clause, startups risk exposing themselves to undue risk, potentially facing costly litigation if things go wrong, reputational damage, and financial setbacks. By financial setbacks it’s probably more correct to say shutting down. This is especially important in the SaaS realm, where data breaches, service interruptions, and other technical issues can lead to substantial losses for customers. If they are enterprise customers these losses can be crippling if a startup is responsible for the cost. So striking the right balance between protecting the company and providing a fair deal for customers should be your goal here.
Startups need to appreciate that customers are becoming increasingly discerning about liability clauses. They expect transparency and a clear understanding of what they can expect in terms of service quality, data security, and downtime. If a SaaS company is unwilling to engage in discussions about liability, it may stall sales conversations with potential customers who are wary of the risks involved in signing up for their services. A one-size-fits-all approach to liability is unlikely to work in an industry where customers have unique needs and expectations, which further underscores the importance of negotiation.
When it comes to the negotiation of liability clauses, SaaS startups should start by assessing their own risk exposure and the industry standards. A risk assessment helps determine the maximum level of liability the company can reasonably assume without endangering its financial stability. This information can be used as a basis for negotiations, allowing the startup to offer liability terms that are both attractive to customers and sustainable for the company.
Engaging in a collaborative discussion with customers during the negotiation process can be good to build trust and build the relationship with your customers. Listening to their concerns, explaining the startup’s approach to liability, and offering customized solutions can build trust and foster better long-term relationships. It’s a chance for SaaS startups to demonstrate their commitment to customer satisfaction and to stand out in a crowded market while still addressing the SaaS contract negotiation points that matter to them.
Common Liability Terms To Use To Push Back On Negotiations
In our experience there are two common strategies or communication methods to use to move negotiations forwards when things get sticky.
- Industry standards – one of the most common ways to deal with requests for large or unlimited liability caps is to reference industry standards around liability. An often quoted liability cap for SaaS companies is one times the annual recurring revenue value of the contract. By simply quoting this it puts your customer in the position of having to justify anything higher.
- Creating context for contract carve outs. Often customers will ask for a blanket unlimited liability when in reality they only need it for certain points. By discussing what these points are with them you’ll be able to create carve outs to reduce the number of things you have unlimited liability for.
For SaaS startups, negotiating the level of liability in sales contracts is not just a legal obligation but a strategic necessity. By understanding the why and how of this process, startups can strike a balance that protects their interests while fostering trust and confidence among customers, ultimately contributing to their growth and success in the competitive SaaS industry.
Negotiating Termination for Convenience Clauses
Negotiating termination for convenience clauses in sales contracts is something you’ll need to push hard for as it directly affects your annual recurring revenue and churn. It can significantly impact your companies long-term stability and client relationships as well as your ability to raise capital. Understanding both the why and how of these negotiations is key to ensuring the best possible terms for all parties involved.
The “why” behind negotiating termination for convenience clauses is multifaceted. First, SaaS startups operate in a fiercely competitive landscape, and retaining customers is essential for sustainable growth. It’s about stopping churn in your annual customers and these clauses can allow customers to cancel their subscriptions with minimal notice and without specific cause. Therefore, for SaaS startups, securing favorable terms within these clauses is pivotal to reduce the risk of unexpected churn or mid term churn. Startups invest considerable time, effort, and resources in onboarding and maintaining customer relationships, so having a more predictable and balanced termination process safeguards this.
On the other hand, clients value the flexibility provided by these clauses, as it gives them an exit strategy should their business needs change or if they find a better tool for their needs. However, they may also exploit these clauses if you’re not used to negotiating them. Hence, it’s a delicate balancing act between providing customers with flexibility while ensuring your SaaS startup’s revenue is adequately protected.
When it comes to how to negotiate termination for convenience clauses, you should consider several strategies. Begin by assessing the specific requested terms of the termination for convenience clause, including the notice period and any associated fees, penalties or refunds. Discuss these terms with legal counsel to gain a clear understanding of the potential risks involved. The core risks you should be looking at are as followings:
- Termination without cause – this allows a customer to terminate without any reason for doing so. This means that the customer has little to no commitment to the term of the contract and they can effectively stop using it at anytime
- Termination and refund – if the customer requests that they receive a refund for the remainder of the contract if they terminate there is a question of whether or not you can recognize the annual recurring revenue as they can effectively leave and get a refund at any time
- Notice of termination – how much notice of termination a customer needs to give you. This is important for renewals, the longer the notice period the better for you and your startup
Once you identify these risk points you can then engage in open and transparent negotiations with clients. Explain that you recognize the importance of flexibility and customer satisfaction, but emphasize the necessity of having a fair and predictable process in place. Propose terms that strike a balance between accommodating the client’s needs and safeguarding the startup’s interests. For instance, you might negotiate a longer notice period to provide the startup with a more gradual transition in the event of termination. Generally as a software as a service platform you’d look to avoid any termination for convenience clause that includes a prorated refund. The only time this may be appropriate is when it is a termination for cause clause.
Negotiating termination for convenience clauses is one of the SaaS contract negotiation points that can have a lot of impact in the long run. These negotiations help maintain client relationships, reduce the risk of unexpected churn, and ensure a more equitable exit process. By understanding the “why” and approaching the “how” strategically, startups can navigate these clauses to mutual benefit, fostering trust and long-term partnerships in the highly competitive SaaS landscape.
Contract Jurisdiction – Important & Often Forgotten
Negotiating jurisdiction clauses in sales contracts is one of the often overlooked SaaS contract negotiation points which lacks consideration for Software as a Service (SaaS) startups but it plays a fundamental role in defining the legal framework under which disputes will be resolved.
There are a number of reasons why negotiating jurisdiction clauses is important for your startup. Firstly, it helps establish a clear legal framework, which is especially crucial for SaaS startups with international customers. Defining a specific jurisdiction in the contract can prevent lengthy and costly jurisdictional disputes if a disagreement arises. By doing so, startups can streamline the legal process, making it more efficient and cost-effective. Additionally, having a well-negotiated jurisdiction clause can also serve to deter potential customers from initiating legal action in a foreign jurisdiction, which may be inconvenient and more favorable to the startup.
The choice of jurisdiction can also significantly impact the outcome of any legal disputes. It allows the startup to select a jurisdiction where they have a better understanding of the legal system, local laws, and potential biases. This can be particularly important for SaaS companies dealing with data privacy and security issues, as regulations can vary greatly from one jurisdiction to another. By negotiating the jurisdiction clause, startups can potentially select a location that aligns with their legal strategy and objectives.
SaaS startups should approach jurisdiction clauses with a balance of fairness and practicality. It’s essential to have open discussions with customers, addressing their concerns and making them feel comfortable with the chosen jurisdiction. Transparency is key, and startups can emphasize that the selected jurisdiction is not meant to be a hurdle but rather a mechanism for efficient dispute resolution.
Startups should consult with legal counsel to understand the implications and nuances of the chosen jurisdiction fully. This will enable them to propose terms that are equitable and reflect the startup’s preferences. While negotiating, consider alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as arbitration or mediation, which can sometimes be more efficient and less costly than traditional court litigation. These alternatives can be particularly appealing to clients who are wary of potential legal entanglements.
Jurisdiction clauses are pivotal components of SaaS sales contracts that startups should not overlook. By understanding the reasons behind these negotiations and approaching them strategically, SaaS startups can establish a legal framework that safeguards their interests, streamlines dispute resolution, and enhances trust with clients, ensuring a smoother and more secure business environment.
Redline What Matters
Raise Changes For Approval To Turnaround Contracts Faster
Negotiating Auto-Renewal Clauses
Negotiating auto-renewal clauses in sales contracts is not a mandatory piece to ensure you have best contracting practices but it can have significant implications for your revenue predictability, customer retention, and overall business sustainability. Especially for startups that sell to midmarket.
There are two core reasons why you’d look to negotiate auto-renewal clauses into your contracts. First, auto-renewals are designed to ensure a continuous revenue stream for SaaS startups, which is vital for long-term financial stability and growth. However, these clauses can also lead to customer dissatisfaction if not handled correctly. Clients might feel trapped or unaware of the renewal, which can result in churn and negative reviews, harming the startup’s reputation. By negotiating auto-renewal clauses, SaaS startups can tailor them to be fair and transparent, addressing both parties’ concerns.
In addition, regulatory environments and industry standards can change over time. What was once an industry-standard auto-renewal practice may become legally questionable, and startups need to adapt to these evolving conditions. By engaging in negotiation, startups can ensure that their auto-renewal clauses comply with current laws and customer expectations.
When it comes to negotiating auto-renewal clauses you should start with the acknowledgment of the potential benefits to both parties. Startups should communicate the advantages of auto-renewals, such as uninterrupted access to the service and the convenience it offers. Then, they should be transparent about the renewal process, giving clients ample notice and control. For example, offer customers the option to opt-out of auto-renewals or set reminders for upcoming renewals. This not only demonstrates a commitment to customer satisfaction but also aligns with best practices in the SaaS industry.
You should consider providing incentives for clients who opt for auto-renewals, such as discounted pricing or additional features. These perks can make auto-renewals more attractive and motivate clients to stick around. When negotiating auto-renewal clauses, startups should also be willing to listen to customer concerns and be flexible about contract terms, finding a balance that satisfies both parties.
Negotiating auto-renewal clauses in SaaS sales contracts is a strategic imperative for startups. It is one of the SaaS contract negotiation points that can help your bottomline. These negotiations should focus on creating transparency, providing customer choice, and offering incentives for auto-renewal. By understanding the “why” and approaching the “how” thoughtfully, startups can maximize their revenue predictability, enhance customer satisfaction, and ensure long-term success in the competitive SaaS industry.
Negotiating Intellectual Property Clauses in SaaS Contracts
Negotiating intellectual property (IP) ownership in sales contracts is arguably one of the most important SaaS contract negotiation points. More and more enterprise companies are purchasing SaaS products these days so standard SaaS contracts are becoming more common place. This means that customers legal teams are becoming more used to how SaaS contract treat IP. IP directly impacts your product development, innovation, and the protection of their core assets. Understanding these negotiations is critical to safeguard your startup’s IP.
The fundamental importance of intellectual property to SaaS startups is that it is really the main asset of a software company. Intellectual property encompasses the software code, algorithms, designs, and other proprietary elements that are the lifeblood of a SaaS company. Retaining ownership of these assets is crucial to protect the startup’s competitive advantage and future potential for innovation. If a SaaS startup doesn’t negotiate IP ownership, it risks losing control of its most valuable assets and, potentially, its ability to compete effectively in the market.
Additionally, IP ownership plays a vital role in compliance with industry standards and regulations. In many cases, SaaS startups are subject to data privacy and security laws that require them to maintain control over their software and data handling practices. Negotiating ownership terms can help ensure that the startup is in compliance with these regulations, avoiding potential legal challenges and reputation damage.
When it comes to negotiating IP ownership, startups should aim for a balanced approach. While it’s natural for SaaS companies to want to retain full ownership of their intellectual property, clients may have concerns about data security, vendor lock-in, and the continuity of services. Open and transparent communication with clients is crucial, emphasizing the reasons for wanting to retain IP ownership and addressing any concerns.
Your startup may consider granting clients certain rights or licensing to the use of IP that they export from your product. For instance, they can negotiate provisions that allow clients to access and export their data or customize the software within agreed-upon limits. Such concessions can demonstrate the startup’s commitment to a collaborative and customer-centric approach.
It’s also essential to consult with legal experts who specialize in intellectual property and contract law to ensure that IP ownership clauses are well-crafted and legally sound. Legal advisors can provide guidance on how to structure ownership rights, licenses, and restrictions that align with the startup’s business goals and industry regulations.
Negotiating intellectual property ownership in sales contracts is a vital concern for SaaS startups. It will help your startup to protect its most valuable asset, maintain compliance with industry standards, and foster strong and lasting client relationships while continuing to innovate and compete effectively in the SaaS market.
Looking For Help on SaaS Contract Negotiation Points?
We always advice that you work with lawyers who have specific SaaS experience. We’ve made a directory of SaaS lawyers here.